🔗 Share this article

In late October 2024, the environment was entirely separate. Before the American presidential vote, considerate Americans could recognize America's serious imperfections – its inequities and disparity – however they still could see it as America. A free society. A land where legal governance held significance. A nation led by a honorable and decent leader, notwithstanding his advanced age and growing weakness.

These days, as October 2025 ends, numerous citizens barely recognize the nation we reside in. People alleged as illegal immigrants are rounded up and forced into vans, sometimes blocked from fair treatment. The eastern section of the “people’s house” – is being torn down to build a lavish ballroom. The leader is targeting his opponents or alleged foes and requesting federal prosecutors surrender a massive sum of taxpayer money. Armed military personnel are deployed across metropolitan centers with deceptive justifications. The defense headquarters, relabeled the Defense Ministry, has – in effect – freed itself of day-to-day journalistic scrutiny as it spends potentially totaling close to a trillion USD of taxpayer money. Institutions, attorney offices, news companies are submitting under the president’s threats, and wealthy elites are handled as aristocracy.

“The United States, only a few months ahead of its 250-year mark as the planet's foremost free society, has crossed the edge toward dictatorship and extremism,” Garrett Graff, commented this past summer. “Finally, swifter than I believed likely, it occurred in this country.”

One awakes with fresh terrors. It is difficult to grasp – and agonizing to acknowledge – how severely declined our nation is, and the speed at which it occurred.

Yet, it is known that Trump was duly elected. Even after his highly troubling first term and following the alerts associated with the knowledge of the rightwing blueprint – following Trump himself said publicly he planned to rule as a tyrant only on the first day – sufficient voters elected him instead of the other candidate.

Frightening as the present situation may be, it's more daunting to recognize that we’re only nine months under this leadership. How will three more years of this decline find us? And what if that timeframe becomes an prolonged era, since there is not anyone to stop this president from opting that additional tenure is required, perhaps for national security reasons?

Granted, all is not lost. There are legislative votes next year that may establish an alternate political equilibrium, in case Democrats regain the Senate or House of Congress. There are elected officials who are attempting to apply certain responsibility, such as lawmakers who are launching an investigation into the attempted fund seizure by federal prosecutors.

And a presidential election in the next cycle could initiate the path to recovery precisely as the prior selection placed us on this disappointing trajectory.

There are numerous residents protesting in public spaces of their cities, like they performed recently in the No Kings rallies.

Robert Reich, stated lately that “the great sleeping giant of America is stirring”, exactly as before after the Communist witch-hunt era in the 1950s or amid the Vietnam war protests or in the Nixon controversy.

In those instances, the unstable nation ultimately corrected itself.

He claims he recognizes the signals of that resurgence and observes it occurring now. As evidence, he points to the recent massive protests, the broad, cross-party resistance regarding a broadcaster's firing and the near-unanimous rejection by reporters to agree to military mandates they report only what is sanctioned.

“The sleeping giant consistently stays asleep before some venality grows too toxic, a particular deed so offensive toward public welfare, specific cruelty so disruptive, that the giant is forced but to awaken.”

It’s an optimistic take, and I value his knowledgeable stance. Possibly he may be validated.

In the meantime, the major inquiries endure: will the nation return to normalcy? Can it reclaim its status in the world and its adherence to constitutional order?

Or should we recognize that the historical project functioned for a period, and then – swiftly, totally – ended?

My pessimistic brain suggests that the final scenario is accurate; that everything could be finished. My positive feelings, however, convinces me that we need to strive, by any means available.

For me, working in journalism analysis, that’s about urging journalists to commit, more completely, to their duty of scrutinizing authority. For others, it could mean engaging with congressional campaigns, or planning demonstrations, or finding ways to safeguard voting rights.

Under twelve months back, we existed in a separate situation. A year from now? Or three years from now? The truth is, we cannot predict. The only option is to strive to continue fighting.

What Offers Me Encouragement Today

The interaction I experience with students with aspiring reporters, who are both visionary and realistic, {always